Read beyond the abstract
Connect a paper’s claims with its methods, evaluation setup, and limitations. Keep the context that makes a finding useful.
Our focus is an AI-native research workspace connecting papers, hypotheses, and experiment design — helping researchers see what the evidence supports and decide what to test next.
Our product direction connects literature review and promising ideas with concrete experiments, bringing the evidence and the next research decision into one place.
Connect a paper’s claims with its methods, evaluation setup, and limitations. Keep the context that makes a finding useful.
Link important claims to sources and relevant passages. Surface conflicting findings and separate evidence from assumptions.
Shape a broad idea into a testable hypothesis, with datasets, baselines, controls, evaluation criteria, and failure conditions.
Keep the evidence and decisions behind each plan, so feedback and new results can inform the next iteration.
Follow one example from a research question to a testable plan. Select a stage to explore the workflow.
Evidence, uncertainty, and researcher judgment guide our approach to research tools. The reasoning behind a plan should be easy to examine.
A useful research plan should let you inspect where its claims come from.
Open questions, missing evidence, and failure conditions belong in the plan.
The copilot should support human judgment, with review before consequential steps.
Our roadmap moves from grounded reading to research planning and connections with research tools. Each stage informs the next.
Start with paper organization and claim-to-source links. Build a small, reviewable literature-to-plan prototype.
Connect evidence to hypotheses and experiment designs. Refine the workflow through feedback from researchers.
Connect researcher-approved plans to data and research tools. Use observed results to guide revisions.
Researchers’ feedback guides our priorities and the connections we build.
A starting point for how individual researchers and teams could use EvidenceTrellis. Tell us which plan would fit your workflow.
Get a feel for a paper-to-plan workflow.
Go deeper from evidence to experiment design.
Keep a team’s evidence and decisions connected.
We’d like to understand your collaboration, integration, and research workflow needs.
EvidenceTrellis is an AI-native startup focused on research workflows. Our direction is an AI research copilot for evidence-backed planning.
The name reflects the idea: evidence provides the roots, and a trellis gives ideas a structure to grow. Researchers’ questions, evidence, and decisions are at the center of our work.
We’d like to hear where your research process loses context, evidence, or time. If you work on research tools or have a workflow worth improving, let’s talk.
Tell us about your research question, your current workflow, and the step you wish were easier.